Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 17:41:26 EST

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "NUMA-Q breakage 4/7 cpu_init() heisenbug"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "NUMA-Q breakage 2/7 xquad_portio ioremap deadlock"
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 12:34:40AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > How old exactly out of curiosity ?
> Since 2.5.15 (about two months ago).

Ha, the testbox rebooted at some point back to 2.4.18 without
me noticing.. Don't I feel a dork..

2.5.25 with fsx -W -R seems to survive. Apologies for the
the false alarm.

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "NUMA-Q breakage 4/7 cpu_init() heisenbug"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "NUMA-Q breakage 2/7 xquad_portio ioremap deadlock"
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:24 EST