Re: L1_CACHE_SHIFT on sparc64

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@ngforever.de)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 17:14:23 EST


Hi,

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> Right. But who needs L1_CACHE_SHIFT?

fs/dquot.c uses it.

> Nothing generic should reference it. Did something get added to 2.5.x
> that needs it now?

Must have been 2.5, but not since 2.5.24.

> I wouldn't have noticed yet as I've been away for nearly half a month
> on vaction until a day or two ago.

Welcome back!

                                                        Regards,
                                                        Thunder

-- 
(Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode)
------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$
N--- o?  K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G
e++++ h* r--- y- 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:24 EST