Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@ngforever.de)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 08:26:52 EST


Hi,

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, David Woodhouse wrote:
> That one can't ever actually happen -- it's effectively a default case in a
> switch statement which can't ever be reached because we'd never get that far
> unless one of the real cases is going to be taken. I think I'll replace the
> return statement with panic("The world is broken");

But don't forget to unlock_kernel() before ;-)

                                                        Regards,
                                                        Thunder

-- 
(Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode)
------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$
N--- o?  K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G
e++++ h* r--- y- 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST