Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Russell King wrote:
> As far as SMP systems and cpufreq is concerned, we're going to have
> a /proc/sys/cpu/all/ as well - you can't control the clock rate of
> each cpu independently on such systems (otherwise they wouldn't be
> very symetric.)
Yes, asymmetric multiprocessing is a much more diffcult field, but
it's not currently an issue to us. (Well, we had this issue long ago, but
the SMP approach won, because even though it's uncool, it's still easier
to handle. Maybe AMP will return one day...)
Regards,
Thunder
-- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST