Re: Driverfs updates

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Tue Jul 09 2002 - 19:43:20 EST


Hi!

> > -It is slow.
>
> I wouldn't call it any fast when I think about the idea that 31 of my CPUs
> on Hawkeye shall be stopped because I unload a module. Sometimes at high
> noon my server (Hawkeye) can hardly keep up all the traffic. Just imagine
> a module would be unloaded then! That's the problem I'm having with it.
>
> What should make a lock for parts of the kernel slower than a lock for
> the _whole_ kernel?

Lock for the whole kernel has less impact over overall code, I
believe.
                                                                Pavel

-- 
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST