Re: Terrible VM in 2.4.11+?

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 07:34:21 EST


On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Thomas Tonino wrote:

>...
> So we're going with 2.4.19-pre9-aa2 for now. I don't yet understand the
> -aa series, for example how 2.4.19-rc1-aa1 would relate to
> 2.4.19-pre9-aa2, so I'm a bit wary of just upgrading in the -aa series
> right now.

The -aa patches are usually against the most recent 2.4 kernel (they are
usually only available against one specific kernel), IOW the following are
increasing version numbers:

2.4.18-aa1
2.4.18-pre8-aa1
2.4.19-pre9-aa1
2.4.19-pre9-aa2
2.4.19-rc1-aa1 (rc = "release candidate")
2.4.19-aa1
2.4.20-pre1-aa1

> Thomas

cu
Adrian

-- 

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST