Please do NOT Cc: list mail to me if there is a
Mail-Followup-Header/unless I ask for Cc:! Thanks.
On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Tomas Konir wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Tomas Konir wrote:
> >
> > > hi i have similar problem.
> > > No dead disks, but after two days testing tcq patches (on 2.4). I
> > > got the two ATA errors (smartctl said).
> >
> > *shrug* FreeBSD should have eaten some of those drives as well, it has
> > been offering hw.ata.tags="1" to enable DMA QUEUED for a while now.
> >
> > And yes, my deathstar DTLA307045 still works without a single broken
> > block, but never used TCQ beyond booting 2.5.17 once (no LVM -> not
> > useful for me).
> >
> > Another DTLA307045 died some days ago, it has never seen TCQ.
> >
>
> I have no broken blocks. Only two errors logged in S.M.A.R.T.
So what's the issue?
> I have no S.M.A.R.T. errors for one year ago. And after use TCQ there are
> two errors after two days. Is is normal ?
Are there any strong hints that TCQ caused these?
> Curently i not believe new IBM disks and TCQ. I'll wait for better disks
> and stable TCQ.
That's your liberty to choose. :-) (And I can understand the IBM part of
it.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 07 2002 - 22:00:16 EST