On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:48:45AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > behaviour under certain application workloads. With the half-md4, at
> > least we can expect decent worst-case behaviour unless we're under
> > active attack (ie. only maliscious apps get hurt).
>
> OK, anti-hash-attack is on the list of things to do, and it's fairly
> clear how to go about it:
Is it really worth the trouble and complexity to do anti-hash-attack?
What is the worst that could happen if someone managed to create a bunch
of files that hashed to the same value?
Jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST