Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Wed Jul 03 2002 - 02:30:41 EST

Next message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit"
Previous message: srinivasa k: "rtl-8139"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Rob Landley wrote:

>...
> The real question is, how much MORE conservative than the distros should the
> mainline kernels be?

Your "the distros" are only a subset of all Linux distributions? E.g. the
2.4 kernel images in Debian (that will be in the next release of Debian)
are plain ftp.kernel.org kernels (no -ac or -aa kernels) with only very
few patches (read: bug fixes) applied.

> Rob

cu
Adrian

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit"
Previous message: srinivasa k: "rtl-8139"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 07 2002 - 22:00:10 EST