Re: [PATCH] compile fix for 2.5 kdev_t compatibility macros

From: Martin Josefsson (gandalf@wlug.westbo.se)
Date: Fri Jun 28 2002 - 10:10:08 EST

On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 16:37, Steven Cole wrote:

[snip]
> That's an odd-looking patch. Is this what you meant?
>
> Steven
>
> --- linux-2.4.19-rc1/include/linux/kdev_t.h.orig Fri Jun 28 08:31:27 2002
> +++ linux-2.4.19-rc1/include/linux/kdev_t.h Fri Jun 28 08:32:36 2002
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
> #define minor(d) MINOR(d)
> #define kdev_same(a,b) ((a) == (b))
> #define kdev_none(d) (!(d))
> -#define kdev_val(d) ((unsigned int)(d)
> +#define kdev_val(d) ((unsigned int)(d))
> #define val_to_kdev(d) ((kdev_t(d))
>
> /*

And here's one more...

--- linux-2.4.19-rc1/include/linux/kdev_t.h.orig Fri Jun 28 16:59:48 2002
+++ linux-2.4.19-rc1/include/linux/kdev_t.h Fri Jun 28 17:01:12 2002
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
 #define kdev_same(a,b) ((a) == (b))
 #define kdev_none(d) (!(d))
 #define kdev_val(d) ((unsigned int)(d))
-#define val_to_kdev(d) ((kdev_t(d))
+#define val_to_kdev(d) (kdev_t(d))
 
 /*
 As long as device numbers in the outside world have 16 bits only, 

-- 
/Martin

Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat
you with experience.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 30 2002 - 22:00:13 EST