Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Fri Jun 14 2002 - 11:04:51 EST

Next message: Matthew Hall: "Re: [PROBLEM] sundance on d-link dfe-580tx"
Previous message: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] Take 2: Consolidate sys32_utime"
In reply to: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91"
Next in thread: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 11:56:34AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

> Add my voice to these concerns. At the very least the code should have
> been moved into a second tree to allow people to work with the old stable
> driver as needed.

*nod*, with periodic known-good _tested_ bits getting merged to
mainline, to avoid the need for an IDE merge flag day as has been
the norm in the past.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew Hall: "Re: [PROBLEM] sundance on d-link dfe-580tx"
Previous message: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] Take 2: Consolidate sys32_utime"
In reply to: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91"
Next in thread: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:31 EST