Re: [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Jun 12 2002 - 16:54:53 EST

Next message: Samuel Flory: "RE: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.4.18 Promise driver (IDE) hangs @ boot withPromise 20267"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [CHECKER] 37 stack variables >= 1K in 2.4.17"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:57:34 +0200 (CEST)

   here is a solution that allows us to eat and have the pudding at once.
   (patch attached, against Linus' latest BK tree):

Thanks for doing this, it looks fine to me. Also, thanks for being so
thorough in your testing. If only everyone would do this :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Samuel Flory: "RE: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.4.18 Promise driver (IDE) hangs @ boot withPromise 20267"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [CHECKER] 37 stack variables >= 1K in 2.4.17"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST