Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x

From: Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 16:33:06 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:22:22PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Well, if you can't fork a new process because that would push you into
> overcommit, then you usually can't actually do anything useful on the
> machine.

Just use vfork or clone + exec. It's faster and uses less memory.

-ben

-- 
"You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 31 2002 - 22:00:21 EST