Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Sun May 26 2002 - 17:10:56 EST

Next message: Erwin Rol: "Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]"
Previous message: Wolfgang Denk: "Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]"
In reply to: rwhron@earthlink.net: "Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1"
Next in thread: Christopher E. Brown: "Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 04:02:17PM -0400, rwhron@earthlink.net wrote:

> athlon-xp == athlon-4 == athlon-mp

Not quite...

>From gcc/config/i386/i386.c ..

if (!ix86_arch_string)
ix86_arch_string = TARGET_64BIT ? "athlon-4" : "i386";

Discussion with Jan Hubicka reveals that this should be checking for
"opteron", but as this was the closest match, it's not equivalent
to athlon-xp or athlon-mp in current gcc.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Erwin Rol: "Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]"
Previous message: Wolfgang Denk: "Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]"
In reply to: rwhron@earthlink.net: "Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1"
Next in thread: Christopher E. Brown: "Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 31 2002 - 22:00:19 EST