Re: 2.4 Kernel Perf discussion [Was Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again]

From: Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net)
Date: Fri May 24 2002 - 14:01:50 EST

Next message: Myrddin Ambrosius: "Re: Linux crypto?"
Previous message: Matt Simonsen: "mount --bind for fstab"
In reply to: Austin Gonyou: "2.4 Kernel Perf discussion [Was Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again]"
Next in thread: Marco Colombo: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Austin Gonyou (austin@digitalroadkill.net) wrote:
> As soon as I can get time on their systems to do 4/8-way testing, I'll
> make my benches available. Should be good stuff. :)

  I may be getting an opportunity in the next weeks/months to play with
  a 16-way SparcCenter 2000 w/ 85mhz procs and 3GB of ram. I realize
  this machine is rather pokey but I was wondering if it might be useful
  to help test the kernel with a large number of processors. So, if you
  or anyone else have some test you'd like me to run (assuming I get the
  machine all set up and running Linux) let me know and I'd be happy to
  try some things.

Stephen

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Myrddin Ambrosius: "Re: Linux crypto?"
Previous message: Matt Simonsen: "mount --bind for fstab"
In reply to: Austin Gonyou: "2.4 Kernel Perf discussion [Was Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again]"
Next in thread: Marco Colombo: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 31 2002 - 22:00:14 EST