Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 16:12:55 EST

Next message: Patrick Mochel: "Re: [BK PATCH] PCI reorg changes for 2.5.14"
Previous message: Dave Engebretsen: "Re: Memory Barrier Definitions"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 14:43:08 -0600 (MDT)

+#define pfn_to_page(pfn) (mem_map + (pfn))
+#define pte_pfn(x) (pte_val(x) >> PAGE_SHIFT)

Wrong wrong wrong, you aren't factoring in 'phys_base'
This is required on sparc64.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Patrick Mochel: "Re: [BK PATCH] PCI reorg changes for 2.5.14"
Previous message: Dave Engebretsen: "Re: Memory Barrier Definitions"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST