On Tue, 7 May 2002, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> No. I told someone to comment out a call to wait_for_cmd_timeout() in
> a procedure where this generates spurious (incorrect) warning messages.
ah.. not spurious.
> You are probably getting real errors (the chip stops) when its interrupts
> can't be handled quickly enough.
the server i have has no network connectivity via that interface while
this is going on.
anyway... i rebooted the machine and (so far, touch wood, fingers
crossed) it hasnt shown the problem so far. (odd cause i rebooted the
thing several times last friday and it didnt clear the problem).
/before/ the reboot i set multicast_filter_limit=1, downed the
interface, removed the module and upped it again (after waiting) but
this made no difference. however, the reboot (with this parameter set)
made a difference where before reboots made no difference.
anyway, Richard, have you spoken to andrey (saw@saw.sw.com.sg -
current maintainer) about your fix and whether it is proper or not?
regards,
--paulj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST