irqbalance+O(1)-sched

From: J.A. Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 10:03:57 EST

Next message: Samuel Maftoul: "Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout (2.4.19-pre2/8)"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: irqbalance+O(1)-sched"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: irqbalance+O(1)-sched"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: irqbalance+O(1)-sched"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi all...

I am trying to mix the irqbalance patch on top of the O1-scheduler
to use it on a dual P4 box.

Everything mix easy but this piece of code in irqbalance:

int idle_cpu(int cpu)
{
return cpu_curr(cpu) == idle_task(cpu);
}

2.4.18 defines it as

sched.c:#define idle_task(cpu) (init_tasks[cpu_number_map(cpu)])
...
sched.c:#define idle_task(cpu) (&init_task)

but O1 kills it.

Any syggestion on hwo to implement idle_cpu() on top of O1 ?

Thanks

-- 
J.A. Magallon                           #  Let the source be with you...        
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam1 #1 SMP mar may 7 01:51:45 CEST 2002 i686
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Samuel Maftoul: "Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout (2.4.19-pre2/8)"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: irqbalance+O(1)-sched"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: irqbalance+O(1)-sched"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: irqbalance+O(1)-sched"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:29 EST