khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]

• Next message: Michael Rothwell: "Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)"
• Previous message: Mike Panetta: "Linux NUMA on M68k?"
• Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]"
• Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]"
• Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

thunder@ngforever.de wrote:
> (Unfortunately crashed shortly after completion when
> I modprobed khttpd and tried to make a connection ...

Does the khttpd patch I posted fix your khttpd crash?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102068445316516&w=2

- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Michael Rothwell: "Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)"
• Previous message: Mike Panetta: "Linux NUMA on M68k?"
• Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]"
• Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]"
• Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST