On Mon, May 06 2002, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Jens,
>
> I didn't get a panic in the limited testing I did just now on 2.5.14 for
> ntfs however I do get soemthing odd. Even when the box is fully idle
> proc/ide/blah/tcq shows this:
>
> TCQ currently on: yes
> Max queue depth: 32
> Max achieved depth: 14
> Max depth since last: 1
> Current depth: 0
> Active tags: [ 1, 3, 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 14, 17, 19, 20, 22, 25,
> 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, ]
> Queue: released [ 1390 ] - started [ 3986 ]
> pending request and queue count mismatch (counted: 18)
> DMA status: not running
>
> Some times the number of active tags is higher, seems to vary...
>
> /me ignorant: this looks wrong. Why are there active tags when no activity?
> If a am right and this is a problem then perhaps tags are "leaking" some
> how?
Agrh, that's a silly bug in blk_queue_init_tags(). Could you replace the
memset() of tags->tag_index in there with something ala:
for (i = 0; i < depth; i++)
tags->tag_index[i] = NULL;
and see if that solves it?
-- Jens Axboe- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:26 EST