On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:14:51PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Anyway, the real problem with iniramfs is on the build side. I.e. what
> do we want in makefiles for early userland/what do we want to use as
> libc?
I have the start of a libc, based on your original "libc" in your
original initramfs patches, merged with some of my initial klibc 0.1
work <kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/klibc/> which was based
off of dietLibc.
It's available at http://linuxusb.bkbits.net:8080/klibc if people want
to poke around with it. I'll dust it off this week, and post a clean
tarball, as it's been on hold.
Actually, in looking at that archive, it doesn't seem to have the latest
stuff checked in...I'll go find it in the morning...
I too am interested in how the makefiles and build process will work :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:26 EST