Re: [patch 7/10] handle concurrent block_write_full_page and set_page_dirty

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sun May 05 2002 - 16:58:43 EST

Next message: Tim Schmielau: "[patch] enable uptime display > 497 days on 32 bit (1/2)"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [patch 1/10] suppress allocation warnings for radix-tree allocations"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "[patch 7/10] handle concurrent block_write_full_page and set_page_dirty"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sunday 05 May 2002 22:57, Andrew Morton wrote:
> + * Buffers outside i_size may be dirtied by __set_page_dirty_buffers;
> + * handle that here by just cleaning them.

"Cleaning", to me at least, means writing out as a prelude to setting clean.
I'm think meant 'just setting them clean'.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Schmielau: "[patch] enable uptime display > 497 days on 32 bit (1/2)"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [patch 1/10] suppress allocation warnings for radix-tree allocations"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "[patch 7/10] handle concurrent block_write_full_page and set_page_dirty"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:25 EST