Re: [PATCH] Replace exec_permission_lite() with inlined vfs_permission()

From: Paul Menage (pmenage@ensim.com)
Date: Fri May 03 2002 - 04:10:55 EST

Next message: Dave Jones: "Re: BUG - linux-2.5.13/arch/i386/kernel - bluesmoke.c"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] Replace exec_permission_lite() with inlined vfs_permission()"
In reply to: Paul Menage: "Re: [PATCH] Replace exec_permission_lite() with inlined vfs_permission()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
>- nfs and coda give -EAGAIN if they would need to make an rpc call when
>dcache_lock is held
>

Actually, coda probably isn't safe with this model - it seems to be
relying on the BKL in permission().

Paul

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dave Jones: "Re: BUG - linux-2.5.13/arch/i386/kernel - bluesmoke.c"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] Replace exec_permission_lite() with inlined vfs_permission()"
In reply to: Paul Menage: "Re: [PATCH] Replace exec_permission_lite() with inlined vfs_permission()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:19 EST