Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 17:54:27 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [prepatch] address_space-based writeback"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "kdev_t_to_struct_blockdevice?"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> Linus, kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the main 2.5 kernel tree.
> It is faster, better documented, easier to write build rules in, has
> better install facilities, allows separate source and object trees, can
> do concurrent builds from the same source tree and is significantly
> more accurate than the existing kernel build system.

Significantly more accurate, or actually *acurate* as in "never
forgets to rebuild anything"?
Pavel
PS: Okay, modulo bugs...

-- 
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly.  However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [prepatch] address_space-based writeback"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "kdev_t_to_struct_blockdevice?"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:18 EST