Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 14:11:59 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: ide broken again"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Yes I know. But my main point is that they maintain the
> whole module symbol and dependency data entierly in user space

Actually thats also incorrect as far as I can tell

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: ide broken again"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:15 EST