Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Thu, 02 May 2002 09:35:36 +0200,
> Martin Knoblauch <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de> wrote:
> > purely technical question: does this work with the "compatible" license
> >strings without making them incompatible? E.g. would this be a
> >compatible license:
> >
> >MODULE_LICENSE("GPL - contact someone@somewhere for support");
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=99926682329331&w=2
OK, if I read this correctly, the suggestion of a MODULE_SUPPORT tag
makes a lot of sense. Although, one could (mis)use the MODULE_AUTHOR for
it.
Given the sloppyness/lazyness of people/programmes in general, use of
MODULE_LICENSE, MODULE_AUTHOR and MODULE_DESCRIPTION should be enforced
at compile time.
Martin
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST