Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Tue Apr 30 2002 - 21:44:28 EST

Next message: harish.vasudeva@amd.com: "basic SMP question.."
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thursday 02 May 2002 04:33, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Actually, now that I think about it, a contiguously-allocated B-tree of
> extents doesn't sound bad at all, even without additional dressing. Do
> you think it's worth a try?

If it solves a problem on a real machine, certainly.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: harish.vasudeva@amd.com: "basic SMP question.."
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:12 EST