Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Apr 07 2002 - 15:51:19 EST

Next message: Segher Boessenkool: "Re: forth interpreter as kernel module"
Previous message: Muli Ben-Yehuda: "Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3"
In reply to: Muli Ben-Yehuda: "Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> userspace. What if such a mechanism existed, however, and was only
> exported to modules with a suitable license (modules which don't taint
> the kernel). Would that be feasible?

I think I'd rather discourage it. There are times its appropriate but very
few. Better that people figure out the right approach

Alan

-- "Who killed more Americans - Al Queda or the cigarette industry ?" -- Anon

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Segher Boessenkool: "Re: forth interpreter as kernel module"
Previous message: Muli Ben-Yehuda: "Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3"
In reply to: Muli Ben-Yehuda: "Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 22:00:20 EST