Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L

• Next message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1, what's "best"?"
• Previous message: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• In reply to: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Next in thread: Nicholas Berry: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

rmk@arm.linux.org.uk said:
> I don't know of any Linux kernel that has ever been able to cope with
> PID1 dying. I certainly remember facing the PID1 dying causing lockup
> as far back as 1.3 kernels, and I even tried to fix it back then. The
> argument put forward for not fixing it is that PID1 should not exit.
> Period.

I distinctly recall it working perfectly OK in around 2.1.50. I had boxen
where /sbin/init was a shell script which would bring up the interfaces,
enable routing, and exit.

--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1, what's "best"?"
• Previous message: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• In reply to: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Next in thread: Nicholas Berry: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4 and 2.5: remove Alt-Sysrq-L"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:20 EST