Andrew Morton wrote:
>Rik van Riel wrote:
>
>>The development speed and code quality of -rmap have also gone
>>up as a consequence of moving over to bitkeeper.
>>
>heh. Now learn kgdb. You ain't seen nothing yet.
>
>Ever tried to use a computer with the monitor turned off?
>Kernel development without kgdb is like that.
>
>http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/kgdb.patch,v.gz contains
>kgdb patches against every kernel since 2.4.0-test-mumble.
>
Groovy. I imported them into BK for 2.4 and 2.5 trees, and fixed up the
merge conflicts (several patch rejections in 2.4.19-pre3), and fixed up
the arch/i386/config.in. BK users should pull from
bk pull http://gkernel.bkbits.net/kgdb-2.4
or
bk pull http://gkernel.bkbits.net/kgdb-2.5
If non-BK users are interested in my changes, feel free to grab them as
GNU patches from
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/patches/2.4.19/
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/patches/2.5.7/
Are there any other arches that have kgdb stubs I could merge?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST