On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:39:50PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Yep, sorry, my mistake. I suggest make it a relative "struct timespec
> *" (more futureproof that timeval). It would make sense to split the
> interface into futex_down and futex_up syuscalls, since futex_up
> doesn't need a timeout arg, but I haven't for the moment.
Why waste a syscall? The user is going to be using a library
wrapper. They don't have to know that futex_up() calls sys_futex(futex,
FUTEX_UP, NULL);
Joel
--Life's Little Instruction Book #182
"Be romantic."
http://www.jlbec.org/ jlbec@evilplan.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST