Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes
From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 17:55:45 EST
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- In reply to: John Heil: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Next in thread: John Heil: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Reply: John Heil: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Reply: David Golden: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
> > It is, in fact, broken on several systems -- I tried ED in SYSLINUX
> > for a while, and it broke things for people.
>
> It does work on many, in fact, we used on a Crusoe based platform
> as well as the other x86s
>
> Let's make it a configurable kernel debug/hacking option else
> we have the added burden of chasing down a common address.
We've got one. Its 0x80. It works everywhere with only marginal non
problematic side effects
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- In reply to: John Heil: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Next in thread: John Heil: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Reply: John Heil: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Reply: David Golden: "Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST