Re: [patch] vmalloc_to_page() backport for 2.4

From: Hugh Dickins (hugh@veritas.com)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 09:46:39 EST


On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Similarly the PAE/non-PAE thing is a red herring. Given that even basic
> data types change size on pae no module is going to be magically pae/non-pae
> clean if its binary only.

Few modules take an interest in ptes, that's as it should be, and so
few modules build to different binaries with CONFIX_X86_PAE off or on
(modulo module versions). I love vmalloc_to_page because it takes pte
dependence out of a group of modules which really had no interest in
ptes in the first place. Less false grep hits when searching the tree!

Hugh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST