> Anon! But there is something uber-ugly about constantly jamming more
> and more stuff into procfs without thinking or planning long term... I
> vote for the non-procfs approach :)
At some point I had done a port of SGI's pset/sysmp interface to linux 2.2.
As far as I know, lots of people are still using it. I haven't ported it
to 2.4 for various reasons, but I have to say - IT IS A MUCH BETTER
INTERFACE than all these ad-hoc cpus_allowed bits.
If I thought that it had a chance of inclusion, maybe I'd port it up, but
last I heard none of the "core" people wanted it.
If we are going to pick an affinity system, please, let's consider sysmp().
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:14 EST