Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?

From: Tom Lord (lord@regexps.com)
Date: Sat Mar 09 2002 - 17:22:33 EST


       Val Henson:

       For a laugh, read the instructions on how to "rename" CVS files.
       Hint: "Rename" is not the correct word.

       $ mv old new
       $ cvs remove old
       $ cvs add new
       $ cvs commit -m "Renamed old to new" old new

       [...] There are two other ways to rename a file in CVS, one of
       which is described as "dangerous" and the other as having
       "drawbacks." References:

       Note that the way to rename a file in in BitKeeper is:

       $ bk mv old new

       No danger, no drawbacks, no hand editing of history files.

I like the arch way of renaming a file:

        $ mv old new

(Yes, history is preserved, etc.)

-t
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:12 EST