On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Pau Aliagas wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Pau Aliagas wrote:
> >
> > > I'd recommend everybody to give arch a try.
> >
> > If you could setup a public arch repository of the 2.4 / 2.5
> > kernel of which everybody can copy/clone their arch kernel
> > repository, that would be a good start.
>
> It is not necessary to setup a central repository.
>
> We need a reference archive to keep in sync with; then everybody
> branches from there and syncs back and forth.
Exactly! Now, is there some arch fan willing to setup this
initial repository ?
> > That would give us some real way to compare the two tools.
>
> It seems obvious that bitkeeper is in very good shape; I'm not at all
> against people using, but I'm sure that if a few people tried arch,
> they'd be gratefully surprised.
Having an initial repository would get a lot of people
(including me, once I have a bit of time) to try out
arch.
regards,
Rik
-- <insert bitkeeper endorsement here>http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:09 EST