Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?

From: Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 19:38:27 EST

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
Next in thread: Dave Jones: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu Mar 07, 2002 at 08:59:47PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 5) ability to exchange changesets by email

6) Ability to do sane archival and renaming of directories.
CVS doesn't even know what a directory is.
7) Support for archiving symlinks, device special files, fifos,
etc.

-Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
Next in thread: Dave Jones: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:01:12 EST