Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages

From: David Lang (david.lang@digitalinsight.com)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 17:42:21 EST


in addition by rducing the amount of readahead you do for each file you
can stabilize into a mode where you are doing _some_ readahead and not
thrashing so this will reduce your seeks.

David Lang

On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:

> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 19:27:49 -0300 (BRT)
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages
>
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > use-once reduces the VM to FIFO order, which suffers from
> > > belady's anomaly so it doesn't matter much how much memory
> > > you throw at it
> > >
> > > drop-behind will suffer the same problem once the readahead
> > > memory is too large to keep in the system, but at least the
> > > already-used pages won't kick out readahead pages
> >
> > err.. Was there a fix in there somewhere, or are we stuck?
>
> Imagine how TCP backoff would work if it kept old packets
> around and would drop random packets because of too many
> old packets in the buffers.
>
> I suspect that the readahead window resizing might work
> when we throw away the already-used streaming IO pages
> before we start throwing away any pages we're about to
> use.
>
> regards,
>
> Rik
> --
> <insert bitkeeper endorsement here>
>
> http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:01:10 EST