Re: Fwd: [Lse-tech] get_pid() performance fix

From: Manfred Spraul (manfred@colorfullife.com)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 17:37:20 EST


> Maybe Alan will mutter something about sysvipc.
> Roughly speaking there are only advantages, especially since
> I think we'll have to do this sooner or later, and in such cases
> sooner is better.

The sysvipc situation isn't that bad. The new interfaces added for
32-bit uids also contain 32-bit pid values.
The semaphore code contains a stupid hack that assumes 16-bit uids,
appart from that apps linked against new glibc version should run fine.

[patch vs. 2.5.6-pre2 attached, but untested].

--
	Manfred

--- 2.5/ipc/sem.c Sun Mar 3 12:04:00 2002 +++ build-2.5/ipc/sem.c Thu Mar 7 23:33:02 2002 @@ -251,39 +251,39 @@ for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) { curr = sma->sem_base + sop->sem_num; sem_op = sop->sem_op; - - if (!sem_op && curr->semval) + result = curr->semval; + + if (!sem_op && result) goto would_block; - curr->sempid = (curr->sempid << 16) | pid; - curr->semval += sem_op; - if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) - { + result += sem_op; + if (result < 0) + goto would_block; + if (result > SEMVMX) + goto out_of_range; + if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) { int undo = un->semadj[sop->sem_num] - sem_op; /* * Exceeding the undo range is an error. */ if (undo < (-SEMAEM - 1) || undo > SEMAEM) - { - /* Don't undo the undo */ - sop->sem_flg &= ~SEM_UNDO; goto out_of_range; - } - un->semadj[sop->sem_num] = undo; } - if (curr->semval < 0) - goto would_block; - if (curr->semval > SEMVMX) - goto out_of_range; + curr->semval = result; } - if (do_undo) - { - sop--; + if (do_undo) { result = 0; goto undo; } - + sop--; + while (sop >= sops) { + sma->sem_base[sop->sem_num].sempid = pid; + if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) + un->semadj[sop->sem_num] -= sop->sem_op; + sop--; + } + sma->sem_otime = CURRENT_TIME; return 0; @@ -298,13 +298,9 @@ result = 1; undo: + sop--; while (sop >= sops) { - curr = sma->sem_base + sop->sem_num; - curr->semval -= sop->sem_op; - curr->sempid >>= 16; - - if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) - un->semadj[sop->sem_num] += sop->sem_op; + sma->sem_base[sop->sem_num].semval -= sop->sem_op; sop--; } @@ -624,7 +620,7 @@ err = curr->semval; goto out_unlock; case GETPID: - err = curr->sempid & 0xffff; + err = curr->sempid; goto out_unlock; case GETNCNT: err = count_semncnt(sma,semnum);

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:01:10 EST