Re: [STATUS 2.5] March 6, 2002

From: J Sloan (joe@tmsusa.com)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 00:10:49 EST

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why not an arch mirror for the kernel?"
Previous message: J Sloan: "Re: Recommendations about a 100/10 NIC"
In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] March 6, 2002"
Next in thread: Guillaume Boissiere: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] March 6, 2002"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mike Fedyk wrote:

>IIRC, LL isn't compatible with preempt, so maybe this item should be removed?
>
huh? that's news to me -

I have run both simultaneously -
they are more or less orthogonal....

Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: Why not an arch mirror for the kernel?"
Previous message: J Sloan: "Re: Recommendations about a 100/10 NIC"
In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] March 6, 2002"
Next in thread: Guillaume Boissiere: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] March 6, 2002"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:59 EST