Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers

From: Evan Powers (powers.161@osu.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 16:25:22 EST

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: xmms segfaulting on 2.4.18 and 2.4.19-pre2-ac2 + oops"
Previous message: Malcolm Beattie: "Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers"
Next in thread: Kilobug: "Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On March 6, 2002 03:57 pm, David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
> Probably the most amusing consequence of this "petition" is that it
> has given BitKeeper a lot of extra free publicity. :-)
>
> In fact more than I've ever given it publicly, and that is the most
> ironic and hilarious part. ROFL.

I'm loosely a member of OSU's Opensource Club, but I didn't sign the petition.

Believe me, the irony isn't lost on many of us. ;-)

-- 
Evan Powers
powers.161@osu.edu (find my PGP key at www.keyserver.net, key ID 0x3445B541) 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: xmms segfaulting on 2.4.18 and 2.4.19-pre2-ac2 + oops"
Previous message: Malcolm Beattie: "Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers"
Next in thread: Kilobug: "Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:57 EST