>MD> 2. It convinced me that the current task-file interface in linux
>MD> is inadequate. So Alan please bear with me if your CF format
>MD> microdrive will have to not wakeup properly for some time...
>MD> The current mess will just have to go before something more
>MD> adequate can go in.
>
>Why not keep the existing taskfile implementation in until you complete the
>elegant implementation?
seriously, ide has always been a joke for anyone serious in storage capacity
or robustness. so what.
if you were serious in using ide drives you would have been using external
patches for quite a while anyway. nothings changed.
Well, nothing, except that now, that there will be a much higher percentage
of users that relies on external patches for ide to be useful
or work at all
time for someone actually has a clue on how modern ide drives works to have
a say for a change...?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:54 EST