Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers

From: Geert Uytterhoeven (geert@linux-m68k.org)
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 08:26:39 EST


On 6 Mar 2002, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> writes:
> > The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University wrote:
> > >
> > > [ succinctness ]
> > >
> >
> > fwiw, I prefer to not use bitkeeper, for the reasons which
> > you outline.
>
> I also prefer not to use Bitkeeper as long as possible for similar reasons
> and because it is too slow and clumpsy
> (although it is already very hard because often source is only available
> through it, e.g. for ppc or for 2.5 pre patches now -- hopefully this trend
> does not continue)

The PPC trees are available through rsync as well.

    http://www.penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:54 EST