On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 1. Indeed the code quality found there is *excellent* nothing comparable
> with the messy crude found currently in linux.
I thought you stated that no one else was using something similar? Or
were you refererring to the userland accessible ioctls? I believe
FreeBSD-CURRENT might also have something in the works.
> 2. It convinced me that the current task-file interface in linux
> is inadequate. So Alan please bear with me if your CF format
> microdrive will have to not wakeup properly for some time...
> The current mess will just have to go before something more
> adequate can go in.
Before removing the current "mess", would it be too much to ask to provide
a patches which remove and incorporate your proposed changes?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:54 EST