We don't need the silly spinlock wrappers in 2.4 either.....
>
> + * Wrapper for disabling interrupts.
> + * (note : inline, so optimised away)
> + */
> +static inline void
> +wv_splhi(net_local * lp,
> + unsigned long * pflags)
> +{
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->spinlock, *pflags);
> + /* Note : above does the cli(); itself */
> +}
> +
> +/*------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> +/*
> + * Wrapper for re-enabling interrupts.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +wv_splx(net_local * lp,
> + unsigned long * pflags)
> +{
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->spinlock, *pflags);
> +
> + /* Note : enabling interrupts on the hardware is done in wv_ru_start()
> + * via : outb(OP1_INT_ENABLE, LCCR(base));
> + */
> +}
> +
-- Jeff Garzik | Usenet Rule #2 (John Gilmore): "The Net interprets Building 1024 | censorship as damage and routes around it." MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:52 EST