Michael Bernstein wrote:
> I would really examine the path you are choosing and the message you let out
> by FORCING people to utilize bitkeeper. I've already lost most of my faith
> in opensource, and in general, the whole bitkeeper issue is starting to
> squash any faith I have left.
Lets stop the fud RIGHT NOW.
Nobody is forcing anybody to use BitKeeper.
Linus still accepts GNU patches via e-mail from primary kernel
maintainers a.k.a. lieutenants, as well as "regular" kernel developers.
The pre-patches, patches, and full tarballs continue to be posted
uninterrupted, just like pre-BitKeeper.
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Usenet Rule #2 (John Gilmore): "The Net interprets Building 1024 | censorship as damage and routes around it." MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:50 EST