Re: Tulip bug?

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue Mar 05 2002 - 12:35:20 EST


Jerrad Pierce wrote:
>
> Well I managed to switch the console to the 8x9 font which gave 42 lines of
> spew... No mention of tulip this time, at least not in what was visible.
> Also none of these ever get logged to messages so ksymoops wouldn't help?
> Most of it is Call Trace and Stack, which I am guessing is useless without
> knowing the exact state of the machine before hand (I do have Call Trace and
> Stack available if useful)?
>
> Other than that I got:
>
> reference at virtual address 00000070 printing eip: c0120095
> *pde=00000000
> Oops: 0
> CPI=0
> EIP: 0010:[<c0120095>] Not tainted
> ...
>
> AND
>
> <1> Unable to hande kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 00000000 printing eip: c010ee96
> *pde=00000000
> Oops=0000
> CPU=0
> EIP: 0010:[<c010ee96>] Not tainted
> ...

You need to run this stuff through "ksymoops"... See REPORTING-BUGS...

-- 
Jeff Garzik      |
Building 1024    |
MandrakeSoft     | Choose life.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:44 EST