Re: latency & real-time-ness.

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Mar 04 2002 - 18:48:02 EST


On 4 Mar 2002, Robert Love wrote:

> If rmap finds its way into 2.5, I and others have some ideas about ways
> to optimize the algorithms to reduce lock hold time and benefit from
> preemption. For example, Daniel Phillips has some ideas wrt
> zap_page_range.

Feel free to help resolve these issues before rmap code gets
merged. I'd prefer to be able to introduce rmap in small bits
and pieces without breaking anything.

regards,

Rik

-- 
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
    -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:36 EST