On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:22:37 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox
<alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > I don't know if this has been fixed in 2.4.17/18, if it has...sorry!
> > :-)
>
> Its fixed in 2.4.18-ac at least, and I think in 2.4.18-rc2. Give that a
> go and check its ok
Hi Alan,
It's not fixed in 2.4.18 (released version).
At least, the array of HPT chipsets doesn't have the 372 entry. Does it
fix it neatly (if the index of the revision is above the array label it as
unknown)?
It doesn't seem to as line 225 in drivers/ide/hpt366.c seems to just use
class_rev as an index in to the chipset_names array (which will bomb out
it it tries to access class_rev=5).
Any chance of getting the earlier patch submitted to the mainstream Kernel
by someone who Linus will listen to ;-) (P.S. Linus, if you're listening
sorry for the aspersion that you ignore patches from people, it's just
that I am a lowly Kernel newbie who you won't know/trust (YET!)).
Cheers,
-- Andy Jeffries Linux/PHP Programmer- Windows Crash HOWTO: compile the code below in VC++ and run it! main (){for(;;){printf("Hung up\t\b\b\b\b\b\b");}} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:33 EST