Re: [PATCH] Lightweight userspace semaphores...

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 02:07:21 EST


On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:32:40 -0500
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 04:39:56PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > _alloca
> > mmap
> >
> > Still fits on the stack 8)
>
> Are we sure that forcing semaphore overhead to the size of a page is a
> good idea? I'd much rather see a sleep/wakeup mechanism akin to wait
> queues be exported by the kernel so that userspace can implement a rich
> set of locking functions on top of that in whatever shared memory is
> being used.

Unfortunately, no. You need to know what userspace is using them for so
you can check to avoid the "add to waitqueue" race.

AFAICT a mutex is the simplest useful primitive that can be realistically
exported.

Hope that helps,
Rusty.

-- 
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:31 EST